For workshops, training, coaching

Live polling for workshops and facilitators

AI drafts the questions from your workshop topic. Participants scan a QR code and answer from any phone. You walk out with an AI-summarised insight report you can email participants the same day.

Before the workshop: know who's actually in the room

Independent trainers and workshop designers prepare assuming a baseline. But every group is different — one cohort might be 80% beginners, the next 80% expert practitioners. Getting the baseline wrong means half the room is bored and the other half lost.

TapInFlow's pre-workshop pulse closes that gap. Type the topic into the dashboard ("AI for product managers, intermediate level"), and the AI drafts six contextual questions in five seconds — single-choice, rating, and open-ended — covering experience level, specific pain points, and learning goals. Pick the three most useful, share the link or QR code with registrants the day before, and review the chart on the morning of the session.

The result: you walk in knowing which slides to skip, where to slow down, and what hidden expectations the room is carrying. That ten-minute prep step routinely saves the first thirty minutes of trial-and-error pacing.

During the workshop: turn silence into signal

Mid-session you can't tell whether silence means people are processing, or stuck. Asking "any questions?" gets you the same two extroverts every time. The actual room — quiet learners, polite nodders, people who already lost the thread — is invisible.

Drop a 30-second poll between modules. "Which of these did we just cover well? Which needs another pass?" Anonymous answers from any phone. The room sees a real-time word cloud or chart on the projector. Quiet attendees who never raise a hand answer freely; you see the actual signal in 30 seconds and adjust before the next module begins.

Open-text prompts work just as well. "In one word, what's the muddiest part so far?" — TapInFlow renders the words live, scaled by frequency. The biggest words tell you exactly what to address next, without anyone having to call themselves out.

After the workshop: turn engagement into deliverables

The post-workshop feedback survey is where most facilitators lose the plot. You email a static survey, a handful of people fill it out, and the takeaways you send to your client or community three days later are guesses. The lag itself signals the workshop is over.

Run the post-workshop poll inside the workshop, in the last five minutes. Open-text "biggest takeaway" plus a 1–5 rating plus "what to deepen next time" — TapInFlow generates an AI insight report (themes, sentiment per question, suggested follow-up topics) before you finish packing up. Share the highlights that same evening via your existing email or community channel, instead of mailing a generic recap PDF a week later.

For paying clients, the report drops straight into your existing debrief template. Themes are clustered, sentiment is per-question, and follow-up suggestions ground your next-engagement pitch. The deliverable that used to take two days takes two minutes.

Open-ended retros that don't lose the quiet half of the room

Sticky-note retros work for six people, not thirty. Half the room never gets a turn. The themes that emerge are always the ones from whoever spoke first. As the facilitator, you're transcribing on a whiteboard while trying to keep momentum.

TapInFlow lets every participant answer your retro prompts (what went well, what didn't, what to try next) at the same time, anonymously, in 60 seconds. AI clusters the responses into themes — no facilitator transcription, no missed signals. Project the word cloud, discuss the actual peaks, end on time. The post-retro report is ready when the meeting ends.

This pattern works equally well for community calls, mastermind sessions, leadership offsites, and end-of-quarter reviews — anywhere a facilitator needs structured input from a group bigger than the speaker can read.

See the full session — AI questions → live results → AI report

Customer interview techniques workshop · intermediate level
  1. 1
    Single choice

    How would you describe your current experience conducting customer interviews?

    • First time — I'm here to learn the basics
    • Done a handful, mostly informal
    • Regular practice, want to sharpen technique
    • Run interviews professionally; here for advanced patterns
  2. 2
    Single choice

    Which step of the interview process do you find hardest?

    • Recruiting the right participants
    • Asking unbiased, open-ended questions
    • Probing past surface complaints into real motivations
    • Synthesizing notes into actionable insight
  3. 3
    Rating 1–5

    How confident are you in distinguishing surface complaints from underlying needs?

    12345
  4. 4
    Word cloud

    In one word, what's the muddiest concept of the morning so far?

    participants type a single word
  5. 5
    Single choice

    After today, which technique do you most want to apply this week?

    • 5 Whys for root-cause questioning
    • The Mom Test framing (avoid leading questions)
    • Jobs-to-be-Done framing
    • Behavioral observation alongside the interview
  6. 6
    Rating 1–5

    How likely are you to share what you learned with your team?

    12345
Step 1 of 3 — questions drafted in 5 seconds
Live results38 participants
  1. Q1

    How would you describe your current experience conducting customer interviews?

    38responses
    First time — I'm here to learn the basics
    21%
    Done a handful, mostly informal
    42%
    Regular practice, want to sharpen technique
    26%
    Run interviews professionally; here for advanced patterns
    11%
  2. Q2

    Which step of the interview process do you find hardest?

    • Recruiting the right participants5 · 13%
    • Asking unbiased, open-ended questions12 · 32%
    • Probing past surface complaints into real motivations16 · 42%
    • Synthesizing notes into actionable insight5 · 13%
  3. Q3

    How confident are you in distinguishing surface complaints from underlying needs?

    2.9/ 5
    38 responses
    4(11%)
    6(16%)
    13(34%)
    12(32%)
    3(8%)
  4. Q4

    In one word, what's the muddiest concept of the morning so far?

    Word cloudLIVE
    • probing ×7
    • biases ×5
    • patience ×4
    • framing ×3
    • structure ×3
    • scripting ×3
  5. Q5

    After today, which technique do you most want to apply this week?

    • 5 Whys for root-cause questioning7 · 18%
    • The Mom Test framing (avoid leading questions)14 · 37%
    • Jobs-to-be-Done framing10 · 26%
    • Behavioral observation alongside the interview7 · 18%
  6. Q6

    How likely are you to share what you learned with your team?

    4.4/ 5
    38 responses
    23(61%)
    10(26%)
    3(8%)
    2(5%)
    0(0%)
Step 2 of 3 — audience answers from any phone, no app
AI insight reportReady when the session ended

Themes

  1. 1

    Probing past surface complaints is the dominant skill gap

    Sixteen of 38 participants — a clear plurality — flagged this as the hardest step. The afternoon module on follow-up questioning should land on a receptive room.

  2. 2

    Confidence in distinguishing root cause from symptom is moderate (avg 2.9/5)

    Below the 3.5 threshold, suggesting the room would benefit from a structured framework before the practice exercises rather than after.

  3. 3

    Bias awareness is the rising secondary concern

    'Biases' is the second-most-cited muddy concept (5 of 38) yet no one selected an interview-bias-related option in Q2 — there's a gap between what the room calls a biases problem and what they identify as a structural step. Worth a 5-minute interlude on confirmation bias before the afternoon module.

Sentiment

Engaged and self-aware. Average willingness to share takeaways with the team is 4.4/5 — the highest-rated dimension on the pre-workshop pulse.

Suggested follow-ups

  • Open with a 10-minute Mom Test framing exercise — fourteen participants flagged it as the technique they most want to apply.
  • Record one volunteer's interview and replay with the room to ground the leading-questions feedback in concrete examples.
  • Share this AI insight report with participants — copy as markdown, download as PDF, or send the link via your existing channel — so they see their own input shaping the next session's design.
Step 3 of 3 — copy as markdown · download PDF · email

Pre-rendered example for the workshop topic above. The 38-participant distribution is realistic — not every audience will look like this. Sign up free to try with your own topic →

Why facilitators upgrade

Sessions live or die on how prepared you are when participants walk in. With TapInFlow you draft your workshop questions from your topic or deck in minutes instead of starting from a blank doc. During the workshop, real-time polls and word clouds replace awkward silences. After it ends, the AI report saves 30–60 minutes of post-session notes — themes and quotes are extracted automatically.

Is this a fit?

Good fit if you're

  • Internal facilitators running weekly or monthly workshops
  • Independent consultants delivering training to multiple clients
  • Train-the-trainer programs and certification bootcamps

Probably not for

  • One-off icebreaker games where polls feel forced
  • Confidential client work where cloud-stored aggregates aren't acceptable

Common questions for facilitators

QCan I use TapInFlow for in-person workshops without WiFi?

Participants need internet for the QR scan or link. If your venue has uncertain WiFi, share the link in advance via email — once joined, polls run over cellular. No app or install required, so onboarding is just a tap.

QHow do I export the AI insight report for my client?

After the session ends, the dashboard shows the AI report — themes, sentiment per question, suggested follow-ups. Copy as markdown or download as PDF. Email it as-is to participants, or paste the structured sections into your existing client-debrief template.

QCan I reuse the same question set for repeat workshops?

Past sessions and their results stay in your dashboard for reference. To rerun a workshop, type the same topic back into TapInFlow — AI regenerates a consistent baseline that you edit just like the original. One-click session duplication is on the roadmap; today the topic-rerun flow is what saves the prep across cohorts.

QWhat if my workshop topic is very niche or domain-specific?

AI generates from your description, plus any uploaded materials (PDF, PPTX, DOCX, or URL — uploads are a paid-plan feature). The more specific your topic input — "GDPR-compliant analytics for B2B SaaS, advanced" — the more contextual the output. You always edit, replace, or add manual questions on top. Five sessions free if you'd like to try it on your topic.

QIs there a participant cap per session?

No per-session participant limit on any plan, including the free tier. The platform is built to handle 200+ concurrent participants per session. Audience size is uncapped; sessions are counted, not seats.

Try Starter Pack on your next session.

If you run one to two workshops a month, the Starter Pack's 20 sessions last roughly a year — pay once, no monthly bill, sessions never expire. Heavier schedules step up to Monthly Pro for unlimited use; switch any time without losing data.

Recommended plan for facilitators

Starter Pack

$9.99 one-time, no subscription

5 sessions free · No credit card · Cancel anytime